|What an impressive set of antlers|
By request of my IT guy, Aaron Manogue, I’m going to devote some time here to Melissa Bachman.
You just gotta love a woman who goes by the moniker M. Bachman(n), don’t you?
At the same time you got to dislike anyone who has an immediate, negative, knee jerk reaction to hunting. Why? Because, the vast majority of them know very little about the issue, but that doesn’t stop them from shooting their mouths off, and attempting to recruit other equally ignorant people to join their “cause”. They’re invariably liberals, and their anti-hunting stance is the same as all other liberal positions, in that it requires ignorance (and mixed up priorities), in order for a person to agree with it.
Show presenter Melissa Bachman slammed after posting photo of lion she killed in South Africa
Bachman posted a smiling picture of herself with a dead lion in front of her, gushing about her ‘incredible hunting day.’ Her enthusiasm was not shared by thousands of others, who signed a petition to ban Bachman from South Africa.
TV presenter and hunter Melissa Bachman posted this photo of herself with a lion she killed in South Africa, tweeting, ‘What a hunt!’
In defence of a lion killer
Now that you are armed with the facts from the above article, along with what you may have already known,it will do you…
In the end however, the hunters are going to win on this issue, because the opposition still thinks that they live in an era that is dead as that lion.
As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, the anti-hunting/Melissa Bachman thing, and all other liberal positions, require ignorance as a prerequisite to support them. What can we do to combat it? Nothing. There is no way that we are ever going to be able to educate all of those people, especially when they do not want to be educated, but now, finally, “hope and change” is on our side.
No one with any amount of intelligence thinks that this country can continue down the same road of fiscal irresponsibility that we have been on for the last several decades. Real change is coming. The only question is will it be voluntarily or not?
If you study history (or the present, for that matter), the only thing that turns the tide against liberalism, is the collapse, or near collapse of a society. We are witness to it happening in Europe right now. As the bill for decades of liberal policies comes due, countries are forced to become more fiscally responsible, whether the people like it or not.
It works the same way on an individual level. When someone is doing well, they tend to spend money on luxuries that they want, but don’t need to have. Often these luxuries do not bring anywhere near the expected level of benefits, and are even counterproductive. Suddenly, the individual finds himself in a worse financial position than he was in years ago, when he wasn’t making anywhere near as much money. The end result is either bankruptcy or a radical change in lifestyle, and the individual wondering how he could ever been so stupid.
For nations, liberalism is nothing more than a luxury item. It’s spending money on things that do not deliver the expected result, and are often counterproductive, but it makes people “feel better” without them noticing any sacrifice on their part. Everything goes along fine, until it’s time to pay the bill. That’s when countries begin to understand that liberalism is a luxury they cannot afford.
All of the liberal politicians, media personalities, and celebrities are going to be proven wrong on Obamacare, and we can hope that a large enough number of people are going to be able to make the connection between that and other liberal policies. If that causes people to lose confidence in those who supported the items on the liberal agenda, that just might be enough to bring about some positive change.
If we’re lucky, it will only take the collapse of Obamacare, and not the collapse of our entire country to turn the tide against liberalism. Once that happens, liberal leaders will find fewer venues, with smaller audiences to which they can preach religion of lies. At that point, the anti-hunting agenda will be placed on the back burner.
The other possibility of course is, we won’t voluntarily abandon liberalism, and the whole country collapses. If that happens the anti-hunting agenda won’t be on the back burner, it won’t even be on the stove.