For those that haven’t understood what Barack Obama has been saying all along, here is a little more proof!
Follow the link and read the article yourself, listen to the interview, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand what he is saying, don’t fall for his line about change, it isn’t the kind oof change that you orI want! Read the article and see for yourself!
Here is an excerpt from the article at Fox News:com
Obama, in 2001 Interview, Lamented Failure of Civil Rights Movement to Redistribute Wealth
The interview — conducted by Chicago Public Radio in 2001, while Obama was an Illinois state senator and a law professor at the University of Chicago — delves into whether the civil rights movement should have gone further than it did, so that when “dispossessed peoples” appealed to the high court on the right to sit at the lunch counter, they should have also appealed for the right to have someone else pay for the meal.
(Read More) (Listen to Interview)
In case you didn’t believe me before, you can hear it in Obama’s own voice! This is proof as to what his plans are, and what his true definition of CHANGE really is. This makes a lot of things clear, just like his connections to Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, and the others as well, he wants to CHANGE the country all right, he wants to destroy the U.S. Constitution or at least re-write it to the point that it is not even the same document!
What is income redistribution? Income redistribution is taking from those that have and giving it to those that don’t! It doesn’t mean those that have a lot or too much, just those that have! If you believe that his tax increase will only effect the rich, you had better understand that that means you! If Obama gets elected it will be too late to stop him! With Pelosi and that bunch already in charge, Obama will be able to get away with anything!
“The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of basic issues of political and economic justice in this society, and to that extent as radical as people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical,”
“It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it has been interpreted.”
The above quotes pretty much say it all, unless you want to see America turn into a welfare state, where you have to work your butt off to support those that won’t work! A vote for Obama is a vote for welfare, a vote for welfare is a vote for socialism, a vote for either is a vote against America, and our Constitution!
Thanks for reading!OpinionHead